Welcome to OrchidTalk Orchid Forums
The Friendliest Orchid Community on the Internet!
OrchidTalk - "Bringing People Together to Grow Orchids Better!"
Let us help you grow your Orchids better; Join our community today.
YES! I want to register an account for free right now!
Register or Login now to remove this advertisement.
Yeah. I get quickly overwhelmed by the "floof" factor as well. My first catt is in bud right now, so I'm wondering if I'll actually like them better once I have one blooming in my home. We'll see. But my reaction to catts in general is, "Meh."
Sorry you have such bad luck with paphs. Mine actually get more light than the experts recommend, but they love it. They're very close to a window that I have tropical plants growing in, so the tropicals help diffuse the light to keep the paphs from having sun beating on them relentlessly, but they definitely do get some direct sun in the afternoon as it passes by that window. It's only for about half an hour or 45 minutes, but that little "boost" really seems to work well for them. I get foliage growing like gangbusters, and my Heron's Faire was just about to bloom for me a couple of weeks ago, but then we went on vacation and my hubby turned off the AC and the buds blasted. I nearly cried.
But anyway, if your paphs are under-performing, you could always move them closer to the window. What's the worst that could happen? A little leaf sunburn? They can recover from that. If you'd like to put them behind your oncids, try to position them so that they get some dappled sunlight. Mine are never in total shade all the time. I also fertilize mine regularly with a high-nitrogen fertilizer. I was told by a really good grower that they need lots of nitrogen to make all the foliage they need to support blooms. I do notice that if I forget the fert for a while, the growth slows significantly. So the high-nitrogen fert is a must for them, I'd say.
Anyway, I wish you lots of luck with the paphs. Don't give up! Who knows...maybe someday we'll be comparing pics of our Sanderianums!
Now I must protest!
Lady Gaga, a Vanda???? Vandas are way to plain and not enough extravagant!
And you all have missed the true King and Queens of the orchids!
Both on complex flowers, fragrance, performance and diplay! Yes on everything
The ones that win the battle on walkover just by showing up is the species of Stanhopea! The true King and Queens of orchids.
/M
Ewww Stanhopeas...Kill it with fire!!!!!
Not here for flowers that last a day and half and look like dangling pieces of flesh.
I love this thread!
Posted via Mobile Device
I love a classic white cattleya, but don't necessarily like hybrids or super floof. I don't like the sherbert multi-colored ones either. My collection tends to sway towards species for the aforementioned reasons.
Better than Cattleyas, species Laelias!! Laeila anceps, Laelia purpurata. Beautiful and classic.
I'm also a fan of schomburgkias/myrmecophilas. They are exotic looking without having to try to be.
My newest obession, of course, are Grammatophyllum, Ansellia and Cyrtopodium. They are gorgeous, and so, "I"M HERE."
Species orchids are sufficiently exotic for me--it's a rare hybrid that catches my attention.
As for vandas--they remind me of the word "happy."
I agree, Magnus. Nothing about vandas says "Lady Gaga" to me.
I see her more as a bulbo--flamboyant lines, bizarre shapes, occasionally emitting the unexpected odor of unrefridgerated flank steak. . .![]()
Just my uneducated opinion here but as far as I see it, royalty would be something of rare blood lines and uncommon. Catts though I love em, vanda and the other commonly found ones would be more of the everyday peasants while the harder to find species would be more up there, snooty and such. Just saying.
Last edited by Dazed; September 6th, 2012 at 02:40 PM.
Lady Gaga is clearly any orchid on any given day, the way she changes her style. Classy some days, bizarre others.
Madonna is a Century plant.