Not the best shape or form ever seen - but I'm determinedly not looking gift horses in the mouth ; maybe - no, surely, this is because the plant suffered, and is now in recovery, and will be far more magnifient next year ( I wish..)
But hey, what about that blue throat ? Isn't that something ?
Do you know the story of Werkhaueserii ? It is told in the Menezes book devoted to this species ( Laelia purpurata, and none other).
The first plant of this variety was found in northern Rio Grande do Sul State in 1904 as an unflowered seedling ( in the wild).There was a lot of controversy about whether it really had been collected in the wild, and if so , whether it should have been - yes, even that far back. The point is that this colouration had never been seen before. The tale was told by the discoverers son, Oscar Werkhaueser in correspondence with the famous German orchidist Rudolf Schlecter. He (Schlecter) said that this is the only flower in all the cattleya and laelia species to have a true blue color.. Frantic searching in the same area eventually found a few more plants of similar or the same coloring - one of which - only one - was of much better form ( so the poor shape is normal for this variation) and that one is correctly labelled as L.purpurata var Werkaueserii Superba ( it's just got onto my wish list ).
As to Cattleya, Laelia, Sophro and all that , the four large flowered Laelia species have long been considered to be cattleyas by experts ; as to Sophros being Cattleyas, and Schomburghkias being Laelias, thats just the lumpers winning over the splitters, and I'll stay with the old names . I'll even stay with Laelia for this one, in spite of what I say , since this name will be understood - even if contentious - and the purpose of the name is to identify the plant to other orchidists. So why change it ?




Reply With Quote


